Monday, May 24, 2010
World Without RELIGION
I m an atheist and i have no hard feeling for any particular religion.
so not against any religion nor in favor of any.
Atheist are more rational than other. n live happily adding to the fact that they are more logical.
yesterday I seen a photo on facebook showing Muslim attacks and then on the comments part a Muslim saying "No its not like that, our religion is much more peaceful. You just see what what u watch in TV or read in articles but if would read out holy book you will find it peaceful". ok i agree that what we see n read is what we believe and agree. but why do we see most of the attack my your community people only.I would like say to those who are Muslims please dont try to convince us that your religion is peaceful . No need of telling i would say .did any of us told you to read our religion holy book ?? did we asked you that our religion is peaceful . if we are not interested in your religion that its ok. its simple we are not . If its peaceful then it will come up that way obviously. you dont have to say or force to think anything in favor of that.... some comments against Muslims were that "if your religion is peaceful then why each n every attacks n bomb blast done by your community."
I seen that it was merely a picture of people with some banners in their hand. But when someone have feeling for their religion. then obviously two different religion's people are gonna stuck in conflict either verbally , mentally , and sometime physically .
my point of view is that it all started from the religion and a day will come when it will end on religion.whether u agree or not the main cause of these wars, this communistic issues ,political issues n these problems arising in between two countries is only because of their native religio's supremacy consideration. one country is trying to superimpose their religion's over other people's mindset. So this kinda thinking just originated by religion only. on the other hand if the both countries are of same religion ,it is seen that they are not under any conflict between them.
principles followed in any religion is good,but religion had does soooo much damage. Religion does not provide boundaries ,it provides an excuse to be moral instead of being moral for morality's sake. It blackmails you into being moral so you can have a reward or escape a punishment. That is selfish. I'd rather be moral because that is who I am and it's the right thing to do.
Then there are all the killings and war and brainwashing and intolerance and recruiting... So this 'religion' needs to go.
the best solution can be being atheist. please once imagine your life n the whole world widout RELIGION . you can see that all people in this world are equal in society . they live in different countries with their happy life . no war are arising in between countries. there is no supremacy of someone :)
but on other hand, when it comes to religion the feelings get arises in our soul for our religion. you want to support that to the core and same others want to do for their own religion. two nations obviously gonna fight . this will lead to 3rd world war :(
At last i wanna conclude it as you have two option. 1st one is 1 side is to be RACIST , have feeling for your religion and be racist . let this whole suffering happen because you dont want to change it, you dont care to change the peace in this world and
on other side. be neutral don't follow any religion. be happy and world is happy . No fights,no attacks ,NO killing of men ,women , innocents. We all just follow a belief of no relgion no god (or say Atheism).
Instead of following a religion try be a good human being by your soul or core of the heart. That means having moral value in your heart and implementing those principles in your life.
I respect all religions in the way that they put some boundaries on mankind . that's the good part of religion.But when that religion come up as the reason of two nation fighting each other that is threatening.
I "respect" a religion in the way for being a good human being kind , loving other, benevolence , not lying,etc
but imagine being that ethical and moral widout religion
just follow this little mantra n then no need of RELIGION.
"NO religion No conflicts No War " :)
do comment at which point you disagree n agree??
Friday, February 19, 2010
"Come ,come to me my love"
"Come ,come to me my love"
As i Keep fantasizing about you
Thou ! why, why u Did that ,
In the hours of darkness , neglected me You
Like Soul separating from a body.
Darling ! come , come to me
at the very moment, I miss You
Slip your hand into mine and walk with me
i want to hear you.feel you, just want to be with you.
And walk on the boulevard of No end
with your eyes gazing into mine,
sharing the eternal feeling of love
I guess would be the incredible feeling of mine
when we were together, i want to be no where else
when i do anything for you, just to see you smile
Silence begins the day as morning comes without notice
Tears begin to fall slowly, yes it is love!
just ask for my love
darling, i Sit here on valentine day,
longing to be with you, i miss your smile
i miss your neighborhood , i miss your laugh
come, come to me my love !
I am patient , but i m not gonna try
if you don't come , i m not gonna die !
-Ashok boudh
Saturday, December 26, 2009
Big Boss 3 result Acceptable ??
The Show was telecasted on the Colors channel on Saturday. Amitabh Bachchan went to the Big Boss house last time to meet the last two finalists Vindu Dara Singh and Pravesh Rana.
He took both of them to stage and announced the winners of Big Boss Season 3 . Vindu is one of the three finalists of the show, along with actress Poonam Dhillon and model Pravesh Rana.
Vindu has received the title of Big Boss Season 3 winner by ‘Janta Ka Adesh’ means by getting highest votes.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
HEAVY METAL BANDS... #
The 25 Best Heavy Metal Bands
now its time to write something about music... written some about controversies , reviews.etc . m writing now about metal band.
Heavy metal (often referred to simply as metal) is a genre of rock music that developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s, largely in England and the United States. With roots in blues-rock and psychedelic rock, the bands that created heavy metal developed a thick, massive sound, characterized by highly amplified distortion, extended guitar solos, emphatic beats, and overall loudness. Heavy metal lyrics and performance styles are generally associated with masculinity and machismo.
******************************************************
Judas Priest are clearly one of heavy metal's most notable bands if only because in true metal spirit they never die. But the most enjoyable aspect of heavy metal isn't the power or the loudness, it's the endless, fruitless discussion over what actually constitutes "heavy metal."
First, there was the dubious distinction between "hard rock" and "heavy metal," then, of course, "punk" vs. "metal," then we had "crossover" bands who polluted the waters still. Now, with grindcore, screamo and other sub-varieties that make you wonder where are the "Log Cabin Metallists," it's to the point where you could argue that Cher and Ween should qualify somehow.
Well, I didn't have quite as cynical a take. But I did notice that I was favoring the old vs. the new. Maybe because everything is fresher the first time around. And while every single bio I receive on a new metal band tells me how UNLIKE ALL THE OTHER BANDS this one is, somehow, it isn't true. I'm not accusing anyone of lying, I just think that most bands and their supporters have what could be called "Parental Vision." That's where the only person who really believes you're beautiful is your mom or dad. These people want to believe their band doesn't sound like all the others and to highly trained ears--senior metallists, that is--the distinctions are obvious and concrete. To normal folks who are just looking to turn the radio up when they hear something they like, well, let's just say it's become pretty obvious why most metal has become part of a hardcore subgenre and not the mainstream phenomenon it once was.
Now for 25 performing outfits who have made Heavy Metal what it is.
25) Meshuggah: Swedish metal bands prefer to make things difficult for themselves. First off, they're in Sweden, not exactly a prime lift-off point for World Domination, unless you're IKEA. Top that with the fact that these guys refuse to play in standard time signatures, standard key signatures or do anything that could be considered standard. They sometimes don't even make the standard "evil" faces. They try. But it always looks like they're about to laugh. The music really is like shoving your head into an industrial fan. Impressive.
24) Mercyful Fate: A Danish metal band fronted by a guy in slightly wrong Gene Simmons make-up, a screech that sends chills up your spine and a goofy fun-lovin' name like King Diamond. Yet, for all that, the guitar playing, the relentless rhythms and the obsession with Satanic gobblygook make them sureshots in my book. Slightly more entertaining than Venom, who were number 26 and therefore left off this list.
23) Alice In Chains: Some people might choose Soundgarden and I might too, on a different day. But Alice In Chains were heavier and weirder, bluesier and more decadent. They pre-dated grunge and uncomfortably jammed themselves onto the Seattle tugboat as it sailed into the Pearl Jam nation. To anyone who says "Hey, they're not metal," I remind you that heavy metal began with a very strong blues influence and Alice In Chains were far bluesier than many bands who have since come to define metal.
22) Uriah Heep: The roots of Spinal Tap? Albums such as Very ‘Eavy...Very ‘umble, Look at Yourself, The Magician's Birthday and High And Mighty sure seem to have conceptually influenced a strain of "mock metal," yet Uriah Heep with the amazing singing of David Byron, one of the originators of the heavy metal vibrato-laden moan, and the brooding organ of Ken Hensley jammed together as many styles as they could sneak past customs. Sometimes it was peanut butter and jelly, sometimes Rum & Coke and sometimes bananas and bar-b-que sauce. At least they tried.
21) Pantera: Phil Anselmo is one scary dude. And I wouldn't want to meet any of these guys in a dark alley. But on a stage, gainfully employed, Pantera were in their element. While their hard and heavy ways made them heroes to their devoted following, one misguided member of that devoted following took things to the point of indescribable horror when he shot and killed guitarist "Dimebag" Darrell (among others) while Darrell was playing in his post-Pantera group Damageplan. Being in a band has its job hazards; this should NOT be one of them.
20) Thin Lizzy: You'll see that I'm partial to bands who can write songs. Play as many notes as you like. Scream your lungs out. Tell me the world isn't fair. Hail Satan, if you must. Tell me more about how you're going to "rock me." Or tell me all about the people in a faraway galaxy who will one day communicate through the electric guitar. But I'll still take someone who can write: "Jailbreak," "Cold Sweat," "Whiskey In The Jar" and "The Boys Are Back In Town."
19) Kyuss: Who to blame for Stoner Rock? Why not these California desert dudes? These days people know about Queens of the Stone Age, who excel at shifting their line-up on a monthly basis, but once upon a time in the early 90s, Josh Homme and his then buddies stayed together on a fairly consistent basis (well, bass players come and go... and the drummer got switched up in the end, but for these guys that is consistency) and cranked out albums and looked to be going somewhere. Then, of course, before they could really be considered successful, they broke up. Which is what stoners do.
18) Guns N' Roses: With sides of punk and glam, Guns N' Roses coasted into the heavy metal mainstream with catchy tunes and a harder edge than their nerf-metal counterparts. There seem to be two kinds of heavy metal groups: ones that can't stay together and ones that never quit. Funny how everyone but Axl seems to be able to play nice with each other. They say money changes everything, but apparently not everything.
17) Kiss: They may never get the respect they crave. But they've got the sales they always wanted. If any band can be said to be a retail industry, it's Kiss. While so many bemoan the fate of the music business since music is so often distributed free these days, Kiss were already making merchandise a key monetary hub in their organization while others were busy building up their reputations with critics. Now grab your Kiss lunchbox and set it down on your Ace Frehley dinette set with those Peter Criss utensils to nicely cut up that Gene Simmons Bologna and Paul Stanley Liverwurst. I don't even own this paragraph. Gene Simmons does.
16) Dio: Ronnie James Dio is what we call a lifer. A Heavy Metal Zelig, always somewhere in the mix, whether it's with Ritchie Blackmore's Rainbow, Black Sabbath, Elf or his own self-titled Dio. One of the originators of that vibrato-heavy metallic moan, Dio not only qualifies for a lifetime achievement award for his contributions to furthering the cause of Metal throughout the world but for Medicare in this country. And they credit him with that funny hand gesture!
15) Robin Trower: Ah, who? You know the guy from Procol Harum? Ok, that doesn't help. Well, ask a heavy metal guitarist sometime who's among their favorite players and nearly every time you'll hear people bring up the name Robin Trower, whose solo albums from the early ‘70s are pretty damn staggering in their sludgy-blues heaviness. This is back when the music didn't mind bringing you down. Which just goes to show what a good Quaalude can do. Start with Bridge Of Sighs.
14) Rush: Rush took a severe beating at the hands of critics for being a tad humorless about their high concepts. But they never whimpered and headed home. Nope. They had too many kids waiting for them in the stadiums who liked their high seriousness and looked forward to living in a future they would never actually live to see. 2112 is still a long ways away...They did it with guitars and they did it with synthesizers and they did it with a drummer who owned way too many drums. But to be fair, he uses all those drums. They're not just for show, like with some people.
13) Spinal Tap: Everyone says they weren't real. Yet I will put them on every Heavy Metal list possible, since their material--you know, the songs--are every bit as good as the "real" thing. And even if they never really did record an album called Intravenus DeMilo, they should've. And if the budget had been there, they just might've. And who's to say Shark Sandwich isn't just the victim of a clever two word put-down review? Maybe someone should go back and re-evaluate this band's imaginary oeuvre.
12) Deep Purple: While Sabbath and Zeppelin have gone on to be immortalized, Deep Purple have fallen dangerously behind. Ritchie Blackmore deserves better than to be lumped in with the "Where Were They Then?" pile. "Smoke On The Water" may be obvious, but "Space Truckin'" and the rest of Machine Head should be textbook cases for all aspiring young hard rockers. And they were purple when only hippies were ruining the color and not dinosaurs and Prince.
11) Slayer: Slayer redefined "heavy" back in the 1980s by speeding things up to the point of hardcore punk but with intricate riffs and shout-outs to Satan that made them obvious followers of the Metal church. With such a volatile sound and temperament, who would've thought they'd still be hanging together this many years later?
10) Iron Maiden: Just caught a live concert of theirs from 1985 on--where else?--a sports network. Great, since the music networks can't be bothered. And boy did these guys look kind of funny with all that billowing smoke and weird prancing around--and those spandex tights. In some respects, almost as good as Spinal Tap, and in some ways better since they were serious. "Rime Of The Ancient Mariner" is ponderous, but the hoof-beating gallop of "The Trooper" and just about anything from The Number Of The Beast makes up for their inherent corniness.
9) Motorhead: By never swerving from their ideals, Motorhead managed to win the hearts and souls of metal loyalists everywhere while simultaneously gathering punks and critics (same thing?) for their cause. Playing louder than others proved to be a key strategic move. Writing "Ace Of Spades" proved to be the other.
8) Aerosmith: There are those who will swear they aren't heavy metal. Yeah, I know. They were once considered a Rolling Stones ripoff because Steven Tyler had big lips like Jagger and Joe Perry was the sullen shadow playing the role of Keith Richards. But this bluesy, R&B-based hard rock band wrote stuff like "Toys In The Attic," "Back In The Saddle" and "Draw The Line" before crashing, burning and reforming in the ‘80s to further a more commercialized rock sound that sure sounded like a lot of heavy metal at the time.
7) Judas Priest: Their songs were always pretty catchy for a metal band, but I always preferred singer Rob Halford's between song banter. Very brief and always spoken in the same punctuated strain that he uses for the climax of their best tunes. In other words, he never lets up the intensity or drops the mask. He is the dominator on that stage and with two guys--K.K. Downing and Glenn Tipton--on guitars who virtually defined the overused trope "twin-guitar attack"--how much more definitive do you need?
6) Metallica: Whether their new album this Fall brings them back up a few pegs remains to be seen, but before they started a virtual war with their fans over $$ (weird, coming from a band who'd already raked in more than most bands would see in a lifetime) and put out St. Anger, the album that made people think that maybe Load was worse than they originally rationalized, Metallica were once the lords of a new generation. Master Of Puppets remains one of the sacred treaties and the self-titled Black Album is that one metal album that non-metal people own and pull out to prove they "like" heavy metal.
5) Jimi Hendrix Experience: Hendrix was far more than some heavy metal guitarist. Putting his music in any box is useless because it always sneaks out. But from the opening notes of "Purple Haze," it's obvious that Jimi was interested in being louder than the other boys. While it's an obvious shame that he didn't live through the ensuing decades, it's a blessing that he came of age at a time when musicians relied on band chemistry and not Pro-Tools to make their magic. Because as good as Hendrix was, he also knew how to pick the right supporting cast.
4) Van Halen: Some metallists say these guys aren't metal because they like girls and to party and they cover the Kinks, Roy Orbison and Motown. But have you heard Eddie's tone? He re-taught the guitar for an entire decade and while they lose points for employing Sammy Hagar (whose band Montrose, you'll note, is absent from this list), they did once bring us that ultimate, premium, all natural ham of hams, the great David Lee Roth.
3) AC/DC: Chords on top of chords, hooks on top of hooks and two singers--Bon Scott and Brian Johnson--who combined for a serious number of knockout punches. AC/DC knew how to flirt with radio without losing the crunch. And how Angus manages to bang his head and hop around the stage to this day remains one of metal's unsolved mysteries.
2) Led Zeppelin: Zep never stayed in one place too long and while Jimmy Page had an arsenal of riffs for aspiring young guitarists to emulate, the band coasted off into acoustic Hobbit tributes and art-rock when they got bored. But their complete demolition of the blues was damn impressive, whether it was Bonzo's beating the drums into submission or Bob Plant screeching for another inch of his love.
1) Black Sabbath: The lords of darkness who were always trying to find the sunshine but couldn't find the energy to lift the blinds. By keeping it simple and focusing on the most elemental elements, Black Sabbath mastered the art of the powerchord and the downward spiral. Killing themselves to live, never saying die and fighting the war pigs! What a legacy!
I strongly suggest you to listen to those bands u hav not yet tried..feel the taste of other band also ... enjoy \m/
in regards i want to know ur ranking ... which one u liked most or any special song of any band. " so comment "
Abby#
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Thursday, June 11, 2009
On net, mind your footprints.....#
On net, mind your footprints
Here are your average computer-savvy urbanites, many of them teenagers. They use Twitter for bursts of personal information, Flickr for photo-sharing, YouTube for uploading private videos, Facebook for keeping track of friends and acquaintances, and other sites for work or hobbies.
It's an electronic blizzard that tends to obscure reality. It's quite possible that some of today's popular social networking sites could become electronic Frankensteins.
There is an invisible downside to social networking on the Net and I suspect that many people who are on Facebook or MySpace or LinkedIn are so romanced by the technology that they are unaware of the electronic footprint they are leaving for all to see.
Social networking sites were started to keep small communities like college students in touch after graduation. Their popularity and the business side of the model meant they had to expand subscriber bases. So now we have 20 somethings and 50 somethings on the same page, all revealing intimate details of their personal life. That's a risky exposure.
In the UK, the Information Commissioner, a watchdog body for IT, recently warned that millions of young people could damage their future careers with details of themselves they have made public on such sites if potential employers did a web search.
Facebook is a prime example. It faced a backlash over its move to expand the service, for business reasons, by adding two features, News Feed and Mini-Feed which allowed users to track information updates of other subscribers.
These updates could include such personal information as a decision to break off a romantic relationship or start a new one. When users objected, Facebook did a mea culpa and added stricter privacy controls. The catch is that computers, Blackberries or mobiles give the senders a false sense of anonymity and new microblogging sites like Twitter, already hugely popular, encourage exposure of mindless gossip and intimate personal details. US President Barack Obama tweets, so does actress Mallika Sherawat who is less discreet about her personal life.
Twitter is a free microblogger service that enables its users to send Tweets, text based posts of up to 140 characters in length, which are displayed on the user's profile page and delivered to other users, or 'followers', who have subscribed to them. Senders can restrict delivery to those in their circle of friends or, by default, allow anybody to access them. In essence, however, Twitter collects personally identifiable information about its users and shares it with third parties.
Twitter is a good way to keep in touch with busy friends but some users succumb to the temptation to tell acquaintances and other users who they are with or what they're having for dinner. The allure of the digital world tends to lower defences and the need for privacy. It's time to take a harder look at what people call 'hippy blogging', the subliminal urge to globalise your personal life.
Ashok Boudh